I never post in this tag, I just enjoy reading it. However, I want to talk about CBS’s desperate attempt to still subtlety (though they’re not trying that hard) rig the game for certain houseguests. Yeah, extending the season for one more week means they’re are probably going to bring someone back in the house (Zach or Frankie) and they’re making it a nine person jury this year. It’s something CBS likes to do very often to keep the favs in the house (ex: the second veto in BB14 to save Dan, the reinstated partners twist near the end of BB13, etc.) Anyway, I see some people think that previous evictees like Amber and Brittany are just much as a chance to come back into the house as Zach, but the truth is they don’t. The reason being is they once they were evicted, they were able to get back home and watch previous episodes, meaning they know all secret alliances and everything going in the house, giving a huge advantage. Although Big Brother has given some obvious unfair advantages to houseguests in the past, they wouldn’t do something this stupid. For someone pre-jury to make it back into the house, they would have to be sequestered like in BB6 and BB13. Not being sequestered makes a HUGE impact on the game that shouldn’t occur, such as in BB3. Alright, message over, sorry for being so wordy.